Physical Therapists Using Clinical Analysis To Discuss The Art And Science Behind Running and The Stuff We Put On Our Feet

Post Page Advertisement [Top]


Reebok Floatzig Tread Review
By Andrea Myers
 
The Reebok Floatzig Tread is a unique running shoe designed specifically for treadmill running. Part of Reebok's well known Floatzig line, the Tread features a dual density SuperFloat midsole with an EVA rim. SuperFloat is a nitrogen injected supercritical foam that is also found in the Floatzig 2. The shoe features a full coverage Griptonite rubber outsole and a breathable mesh upper to make it more conducive to indoor training. With all of the shoe choices on the market in 2026, do we need a treadmill specific shoe? Read on to find out.



Reebok Floatzig Tread
Price: $110.00 at Reebok
Weight: 9.1oz, 258g (men's size 9)
Stack Height: Reebok states the stack height is 20mm, but does not specify heel or forefoot
Drop: 8 mm
Shoe Purpose: Treadmill specific running shoe

Pros: Wider toe box with comfortable overall fit, good cushioning for easy runs
Cons: Shoe feels too heavy and stiff to run faster than easy


RUNNING SHOE SUMMARY


The Reebok Floatzig Tread is a lower stack, moderately cushioned shoe designed for treadmill running. Its dual density SuperFloat midsole with an EVA rim provides moderate cushioning while still providing good ground (or belt) feel. Its unique Griptonite outsole should provide better durability than running shoes with exposed midsole when running on a textured treadmill belt. The shoe runs fairly neutral thanks to a narrow rearfoot and midfoot, but does feature lateral forefoot sole flaring, which will work well for those with lateral forefoot stability needs, but may be too aggressive for those who are sensitive to forced medial forefoot loading.



FIT
(To learn how a shoe should fit, check out our full podcast on fit by Matt Klein.)

Andrea: The Reebok Floatzig Tread fits true to size in my usual women's 9.5. I have a full thumb's width from the front of my big toe to the end of the shoe. While the rearfoot and midfoot are narrow, the forefoot widens just before the MTPs and provides a comfortable amount of width and volume in the toe box. There is a rigid heel counter with a small amount of internal padding. The gusseted tongue is thin, but it does feature a small amount of additional padding closest to the ankle. The rest of the tongue is not padded enough to protect the dorsum of the foot from the laces, and I had to be cautious with how I tightened the laces to avoid lace bite. It was relatively easy to lock my feet down in the Floatzig Tread and I did not experience any foot translation or heel slippage in the shoe. Overall, the fit is comfortable, but I would like more padding in the tongue for protection from the laces.

Andrea's Typical Size: Women's US Size 9.5
Shoes that have fit Andrea well: Brooks Hyperion Max 1 and 2, Topo Cyclone 2, Nike Vaporfly 3, ASICS Novablast 4 and 5, PUMA MagMax Nitro
Shoes that have fit snug: Altra Escalante 4 (toe box width and volume), Mizuno Wave Rebellion Pro 2 and 3 (length), Saucony Endorphin Speed and Pro 1-4 (length)
Shoes that have fit large: Adidas Boston 12 (length), Adidas Adios 8 (length)


Doctors of Running Checklist

Is This a Good Shoe for Walking: Yes
Is This a Good Shoe for Standing: Yes
Is the Forefoot Flexible: Yes
How Flexible is the Shoe: Forefoot flexible, midfoot and rearfoot not flexible
Is This a Good Heel Bevel: Yes
Recommended for Haglunds: No
Is This Shoe Orthotic Friendly: Maybe
Recommended for Sockless: No
Durability Expectation: High




PERFORMANCE

Andrea: The Reebok Floatzig Tread is the first treadmill specific shoe I have tested. It arrived at an opportune time for me in Connecticut, as we are having the worst winter we have had in several years, which has kept me on the treadmill much more than I would like, and of course I kept all of my test runs in the shoe on the treadmill. My first run in the shoe was a 5 mile recovery run. The shoe surprised me with more compliance than I expected for a lower stack shoe. It felt comfortable for jogging along and felt like it was giving me a little bounce with each step. My next run in the shoe was a 6 mile easy run with several pickups from marathon pace down to threshold pace. To my surprise, the shoe felt stiff and heavy each time I tried to pick up the pace. I particularly felt like I was fighting the forefoot of the shoe, which was unexpected due to the flexibility in the forefoot. Upon further assessment, I think that the forefoot flex point is too far towards the toes, whereas I would like it to flex further back. I also think this feeling is accentuated by the sharp toe spring. I typically do not get along with shoes that have both a sharp toe spring and a flexible forefoot.

The rest of my test runs in the shoe were easy runs because I didn't want to have to fight the shoe in another workout. Again, the midsole felt nicely compliant without being soft or unstable, and I liked the grip of the full coverage outsole rubber. While Reebok only states that the stack height is 20mm (but does not specify whether this is in the heel or forefoot), it appears that the rearfoot stack is around 28mm and the forefoot is 20mm. Assuming this, the shoe feels like a somewhat higher stack shoe than it actually is. I found the shoe comfortable for midfoot landings thanks to the small heel bevel, the wide forefoot, and the large lateral forefoot sole flare. 

Traction on the treadmill is excellent in the shoe thanks to the Griptonite full coverage outsole. I would expect high durability from the outsole, particularly if you limit your runs in the shoe to the treadmill. There is almost no visible wear on my pair after 25 treadmill miles.


STABILITY
(Learn more about stability in our full guide)

Andrea: The Reebok Floatzig Tread is a neutral shoe with rare forefoot stability features. The narrow midfoot and rearfoot do not provide much in the way of stability or guidance. The wide forefoot features significant lateral flaring, which Reebok calls a lateral outrigger, which results in a strong medial forefoot bias. This will work well for those with lateral forefoot stability needs (like myself) but may feel too aggressive for those who are sensitive to being pushed medially in the forefoot. The shoe also features an early forefoot rocker and sharp toe spring. The presence of the toe spring will make the shoe inappropriate for those with hallux rigidus or general toe extension limitations. 


Thoughts as a DPT: Do We Need Treadmill Specific Shoes?
By Andrea Myers

The Reebok Floatzig Tread is the only treadmill specific shoe I have tested, and the only other treadmill specific shoe I can think of is the Adidas Treadflow, which was released in 2025, but doesn't appear on Adidas's US website. Both shoes feature a breathable upper, a full length rubber outsole, lower stack, and a dual density midsole. The existence of these shoes begs the question - do we need shoes that are designed specifically for treadmill running? Are the biomechanics of treadmill running sufficiently different from overground running that they justify a separate type of shoe?

A 2020 systematic review and meta-analysis analyzed the differences in running biomechanics between overground running and treadmill running. It included 33 studies with 494 participants and compared motorized treadmill running to running on a track, concrete, or laboratory runway. In general, the authors concluded that "spatiotemporal parameters, kinematic, kinetic, muscle activity, and muscle-tendon outcome measures are largely comparable between motorized treadmill and overground running."

However, they did find some statistically significant differences between treadmill and overground running, including decreased vertical displacement (less bouncy gait pattern), minimally increased knee flexion (bending) at initial contact, decreased knee flexion range of motion during stance phase, minimally decreased foot-ground angle (less dorsiflexion) at initial contact, decreased peak propulsive force, minimally increased ground contact time, and conflicting findings for amplitude of muscle activity, but a trend for lower activity in most muscles investigated. The authors theorize that these differences can be explained by variations in surface stiffness between treadmills and overground surfaces, with the treadmill surface being less stiff; runners not being as comfortable on a treadmill as compared to overground, which may result in biomechanical compensations; insufficient treadmill motor power and restrictive belt dimensions, which may cause belt speed variations and subsequent changes in biomechanics; and differences in air resistance at higher overground running speeds as compared to treadmill running. 

None of these biomechanical differences justify the need for a treadmill specific running shoe. However, if I were designing a shoe for treadmill use, I would make sure it had a highly breathable upper and a wear resistant outsole. The highly textured surface of a treadmill belt does wear shoes down faster, particularly those with areas of exposed midsole. The rubber outsole design of the Floatzig makes sense from this perspective. Likewise, a breathable upper is a desirable feature of an indoor shoe due to warmer indoor temperatures and likely reduced airflow. If the geometry of the Floatzig Tread or Treadflow work with your mechanics, and you do a lot of running on the treadmill, then one of these shoes may be a good choice for you. Otherwise, I would recommend choosing treadmill shoes based on comfort and performance, not whether they are specifically designed for treadmill use.

References:

Van Hooren, B., Fuller, J. T., Buckley, J. D., Miller, J. R., Sewell, K., Rao, G., Barton, C., Bishop, C., & Willy, R. W. (2020). Is Motorized Treadmill Running Biomechanically Comparable to Overground Running? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cross-Over Studies. Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 50(4), 785–813.




RECOMMENDATIONS

Andrea: I like Reebok's idea for a treadmill specific shoe, however this particular shoe has features that will limit it's use for many runners. Just like there is not one best outdoor running shoe, there will not be one best treadmill running shoe. I think the sharp toe spring, narrow rearfoot and midfoot, and medially biased forefoot are going to greatly limit the number of runners this shoe works for. I would instead encourage Reebok to design this shoe as a stable neutral shoe, with a wider overall base, reduced toe spring, and balanced sole flaring throughout the length of the shoe. I also like that Reebok kept the stack height on the lower side, because there are not that many shoes with a stack below 30mm these days, and I would recommend that they maintain the lower profile in version 2. 

WHO IS THIS SHOE FOR?

Andrea: The Reebok Floatzig Tread is a treadmill specific shoe that features rare forefoot stability thanks to large lateral sole flaring. This feature in combination with the sharp toe spring will limit the number of runners who will be able to run comfortably in the shoe, as the toe spring makes it inappropriate for those with reduced toe extension range of motion. If you are a runner who has a narrow heel and midfoot and a wider forefoot, needs lateral forefoot stability, and has normal toe extension range of motion, this may be a good treadmill shoe for you. I personally found the forefoot design to be best for easy running, but others may be able to use it for faster paces. At $110, this shoe is a bargain for those who get along with the design features. I think this shoe would be an even better value as a true stable neutral shoe, and I hope that Reebok will take my recommendations into consideration for future versions.


GRADES

Andrea
Fit: A- (Comfortable, wide toe box, secure upper, but thin tongue results in lace bite)
Performance: B- 
(Sharp toe spring combined with flexible forefoot makes the shoe only comfortable at easy paces. Shoe feels also feels heavy on foot when picking up the pace. Traction is excellent and upper is breathable, which are appreciated on the treadmill)
Stability: [neutral] B (Narrow midfoot and rearfoot reduce stability in this area, but wider forefoot and large lateral sole flare make this a rare shoe with lateral forefoot stability. Sharp toe spring will not work for those with toe mobility limitations)
Value: A (If this shoe works with your mechanics, $110 is a steal)
Personal: B- (This shoe was only comfortable for easy runs for me, and there are many other shoes that I like better for easy runs)
Overall Design: B


SHOP | SUPPORT DOR

Reebok Floatzig Tread
Price: $110 at Running Warehouse

Shop Men | Shop Women


*Using the link to purchase helps support Doctors of Running. Thanks so much!

Check out Gear We Love
Naked Belt The best way to carry your phone and goods on the run. No bounce and various sizes for waist.
Saysky Running Gear: We were really taken aback by this Scandinavian company's ultra-thin, durable performance clothing
Skratch Recovery, Coffee Flavor: Mental and physical boost post run. Coffee flavor is excellent and goes great straight into a fresh brewed cup
goodr Sunglases: Run in style with goodr's super fun sunglasses.
Feetures Socks: Massively grippy socks that will make you feel more one with the shoe
Amphipod Hydraform Handheld Water Bottle: Perfect for long runs when you need hydration in the summer
Trigger Point Foam Roller: Help get those knots out post-run and feel better for tomorrow
Ciele Hat: Our team's favorite running hat of choice!
Fractel Hats: Our team's wider fitting running hat of choice!


FURTHER READING

Salomon Ultra Glide 4 | Review
Salomon's long distance trail trainer. 















Find all Shoe Reviews at Doctors of Running here.

Thanks for reading!

FOLLOW DOCTORS OF RUNNING ON SOCIAL MEDIA

Facebook: Doctors of Running
Youtube Channel: Doctors of Running
Instagram: @doctorsofrunning
LinkedIn: Doctors of Running
Strava: Doctors of Running
Podcast: Virtual Roundtable

PODCAST

Check out the Doctors of Running Podcast to find more reviews, interviews, and running features from the team.

Visit our Podcast Page
Find us on Apple
Find us on Spotify

Editor's Note: As always, the views presented on this website belong to Matt Klein (Founder) or the selected few who contribute to these posts. This website should not and does not serve as a replacement for seeking medical care. If you are currently injured or concerned about an injury, please see your local running physical therapist. If you are in the Sherwood, Santa Barbara, Danbury and Stevens Point areas, we are currently taking clients for running evaluations. Email us at doctorsofrunning@gmail.com for more information.

***Disclaimer: These shoes were provided free of charge in exchange for a review.  We thank the people at Reebok for sending us a pair.  This in no way affected the honesty of this review. We systematically put each type of shoe through certain runs prior to review. For trainers and performance trainers, we take them on daily runs, workouts, recovery runs and a long run prior to review (often accumulating anywhere from 20-50 miles in the process). For racing flats we ensure that we have completed intervals, a tempo or steady state run as well as a warm-up and cool down in each pair prior to review. This systematic process is to ensure that we have experience with each shoe in a large variety of conditions to provide expansive and thorough reviews for the public and for companies. Our views are based on our extensive history in the footwear industry and years testing and developing footwear. If you are a footwear rep looking for footwear reviews or consultations on development, we are currently looking to partner with companies to assist, discuss and promote footwear models. Partnership will not affect the honesty of our reviews.

Please feel free to reach out, comment and ask questions!
Contact us at doctorsofrunning@gmail.com

NEXT: 
Salomon Ultra Glide 4

Bottom Ad [Post Page]

// ]]>